The new law provided that after August 1st, 1915 every employer with four or more employees was required to pay injured workers compensation unless they elected before that time not to do so. If they elected not to do so the old remedy of being sued in court would be in force. The Act provided 3 ways by which employers could pay compensation:
- Employers could insure their risk with the newly created State Fund
- Employers could insure their risk with a private insurance company
- If financially able, employers could carry their own risk and be self-insured
These three provisions remain today.
At a meeting in Colorado Springs several of the largest mining employers in Colorado unanimously agreed to patronize the new State Fund. It was estimated that the metal mining industry alone would see the new Fund covering $5,000,000 in payrolls with the Fund receiving $125,000 in premiums. $5,000,000 in 1915 dollars would equate in today's dollars to approximately $506,000,000.
Not surprisingly, there had been opposition to the new Act and one of the most active opponents of the compensation law had been the Denver School Board, at least in terms of applying the law to school districts. On August 12, 1915 the Denver Times reported that the Denver School District and all other taxing units in the state would be required to comply with the provisions of the new law.
The law provided injured workers one half of their weekly wages up to a maximum of $8 per week with compensation beginning in the fourth week after the injury. Before that time there was coverage for medical care.
There were lofty expectations of the newly passed Colorado Workmen's Compensation Act:
- It would be a boon to the working men of the State by relieving hundreds, if not thousands, of injury cases which had gone uncompensated
- It would "bring about a spirit of harmony and cooperation" between employers and employees
- It would relieve the over-burdened court system and relieve employers from the loss of time and expense of long and sometimes bitter trials
How the Act has lived up to those expectations remains a topic of conversation to this day.
No comments:
Post a Comment